‘I would’ve much rather just have been laid off with everyone else’: Job forces employees into negative PTO debt, where taking time off means owing the company money later

Advertisement
  • "Job is forcing us to go into negative PTO then pay that money back once we are fired/laid-off/quit"

    "Once I am back in the positive, I'll be immediately submitting my resignation"
  • I work for a federally-funded nonprofit that has been through many changes and staffing updates since January due to all of the executive orders. Most of our projects were immediately canceled, which caused workload to plummet.
  • After making it through several rounds of layoffs (I am on a lower labor category than everybody else so it was cheaper to keep me), the remaining employees have been told that we are no
  • longer allowed to charge to overhead & will be forced to take PTO for slow periods instead. They are allowing up to negative 80 hours to be charge then we go
  • Cheezburger Image 10496543232
  • back to charging overhead. This means basically logging off and being "on call" until work comes in & a manager or coworker texts you to alert you. For some reason,
  • they have denied us the option to use unpaid leave for this time period, so we have no choice but to go into the negative.
  • OOT ALLESONIT
  • Right before this new policy, I'd just come back from a week long vacation & had zero PTO hours remaining. I am currently at -21 hours and expect to add more
  • since work isn't picking up much. I want to quit so bad but I can't afford the $500+ being taken from my final check.
  • How are they even allowed to do this??? I would've much rather just have been laid off with everyone else. I am miserable and stressed to the point that I feel sick. Please help.
  • UPDATE: I will be taking FMLA starting in a couple of weeks (already discussed with management prior to any of this) so I can build up my PTO balance without going any further into the
  • negative. I will forego STD and supplement the lost pay at my PT job. Once I am back in the positive, I'll be immediately submitting my resignation. Thank you to everyone who answered.
  • Intelligent Type6336 If they require you to be available at a moments notice for actual work they should be paying you. They could always make you salary to do so, but they shouldn't be making you
  • take PTO to be available for them to give work to. Either they pay you or tell you they don't have work for you at this time. They don't get to
  • charge you money to be available. Your time should be compensated. That's not how it works. Everyone's job has slow periods.
  • pennywitch What happens if they text you and you don't text back? Answer this and I can answer your question.
  • SnuggleBear2 When you are on call and waiting for work. Can you go out and live your life and do other things? Or do you have to wait by the phone and do nothing while you wait for a call from them?
  • Nemesis651 Don't take PTO, file for unemployment. Reduced hours. They'll have to approve, formally fire you, or hire back at original hours.
  • jp58709 If you are hourly, this is generally permissible. If you are salaried, they generally cannot deduct negative PTO from final pay.
  • OffSeer NAL but non-profits that have a direct contract with the Feds are under terms and conditions that they have no control over. I've
  • read that overhead costs at some Universities reached 50% and when the contract was stopped by the government then it hits
  • immediately on the support staff( Federal overhead is set at 10% but could go higher with proof). Your non-profit could have in the past opened a line of credit to cover shortfalls in revenue but there's obvious risks.
  • When I was on the board of director of a nonprofit there was a line of credit that was being paid off monthly for years just making the interest payments. It took a lot of effort and time to finally pay it off.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article